~*~
Today, I offer one of those “everybody needs a good editor”
posts, a subject I love to harp on, as any reader of this blog knows. However,
this one comes with a twist: every writer needs a good editor, even editors who
also write.
A few months back, I whipped up a short story. It sprung
from some flash fiction and grew from there. Then, since it seemed to fit into
the theme of a short story competition, I polished it to the best of my ability
and entered it. It didn’t get picked for their anthology. Despite my repeated
references to readers whose opinions I trusted, countless adjustments, and a precision
word count that met the maximum limit with exactness, the two judges didn’t
think as well of my work as I did.
Their evaluations sat on my desk unopened for a few months
because I dread (just as much as any author) the red pencil of death which I
knew awaited me within. Not so; I received just a 1-5 grade scale in seven
different areas. The judges gave me numbers, little else. One kindly left a positive
comment. The other felt I tried too hard to be artsy and had inadequate tension
or conflict (I still don’t get that). I got a 4/5 from the kind one, a 3/5 from
the more critical.
Sr. Editor McKenna Gardner |
But, since I wrote this months and months ago, I’m giving
myself a bye for not following my own advice. I have since corrected that egregious
error, with happy results. The trick here, my friends, is to use an editor whom
you both respect and trust. It’s not about who will be the most kind or who
will give you the most strokes, but who will help you produce the best work
within you. Who will properly guide you to your goal? I turned to the senior editor at Xchyler Publishing, McKenna Gardner.
A good editor is like a good coach. They identify strengths
and help the author stretch their muscles, build their stamina, and fine-tune
their literary muscle memory. They identify weaknesses and drum them out of the
author. Like the coach, the editor doesn’t replace the author. They do not
rewrite their stories; they draw them out of the author. They assist the author in fulfilling their own highest potential.
They’re the author’s personal cheering section.
All that said, I required no fewer than thirteen separate
versions to make my short story worthy of public consumption. After all that trouble, what did I change? I added a
grand total of 131 words to the manuscript—one hundred and thirty one excruciating words wrenched out of me with painstaking care.
Months after the short story competition had come and
gone, why bother? Simple: I wanted to explore the
possibilities with such a coach in my corner as those that we have at XchylerPublishing.
If you would care to review the product of our exertions, you can review my separate post, Crossroads, here. Leave a comment and tell me what you think.
1 comment:
Molding a product is much easier when the original piece is solid and already well-crafted. :)
Post a Comment